CONFERENCE EVALUATION FORM MIPS Conference Evaluation Your evaluation, ideas and opinion are important in assessment of the conference. 1 = Very low 2 = Low 3 = Neither Low nor High 4 = High 5 = Very High Pre-Arrival 1. Registration process was simple, fast and efficient 1 2 3 4 5 2. Advance information about the conference was adequate 1 2 3 4 5 Arrival 1. Rate the materials provided at the conference 1 2 3 4 5 Workshop Location / Facility 1. The venue and facilities 1 2 3 4 5 2. Food quality and variety 1 2 3 4 5 Speakers Dr Betchani Tchereni Topic : Building Resilient Supply Chains During Crises 1. He was knowledgeable on subjects covered 1 2 3 4 5 2. The quality of his presentation and his delivery was excellent 1 2 3 4 5 3. His responsiveness to questions was thoughtful 1 2 3 4 5 4. Participation and interaction were encouraged 1 2 3 4 5 Prophet Dr Shepherd Bushiri Topic : Building Survival Strategies During Economic Crises 1. He was knowledgeable on subjects covered 1 2 3 4 5 2. The quality of his presentation and his delivery was excellent 1 2 3 4 5 3. His responsiveness to questions was thoughtful 1 2 3 4 5 4. Participation and interaction were encouraged 1 2 3 4 5 Prof Joseph Mfutso Bengo Topic : Implementing Sustainable, Accountability, Transparency and Ethical Practices in Malalwi Procurement and Supply 1. He was knowledgeable on subjects covered 1 2 3 4 5 2. The quality of his presentation and his delivery was excellent 1 2 3 4 5 3. His responsiveness to questions was thoughtful 1 2 3 4 5 4. Participation and interaction were encouraged 1 2 3 4 5 Dr Queen Dube Topic : Profiling Supply Chain Vulnerabilities critical to Malawi Health and Economic Security Turnaround. 1. She was knowledgeable on subjects covered 1 2 3 4 5 2. The quality of her presentation and her delivery was excellent 1 2 3 4 5 3. Her responsiveness to questions was thoughtful 1 2 3 4 5 4. Participation and interaction were encouraged 1 2 3 4 5 Panel Dscussion-Leadership Styles Ideal for Private Partnership in Social Economic Developmenthip 1. Panelists were knowledgeable on subjects covered 1 2 3 4 5 2. Panelists responsiveness to questions was thoughtful 1 2 3 4 5 Overall Conference – Please Rate the Following 1. Rate your overall conference experience 1 2 3 4 5 2. Was the time allocated to each session appropriate? 1 2 3 4 5 3. Rate the increase of your knowledge and/or network as a result of the workshop? 1 2 3 4 5 4. Would you attend any future MIPS conference? Yes No Maybe 5. Would you recommend MIPS conference? Yes No Maybe 6. What suggestions do you have for improving the conferences? 7. Propose crucial topic areas for future conferences 8. Any other comments If you are human, leave this field blank. Submit Δ